Editorial standards

Importance before volume

A story should answer two questions: what changed, and how much does it matter? We select events for their scale, consequences and relevance to readers. We do not fill the feed with minor releases to meet a quota.

Facts and sources

Automated publication requires at least two independent confirmations and an accessible original source. Several sites repeating one press release do not count as independent confirmation. A topic without enough evidence stays in review. We identify a company statement as such and distinguish it from independent testing or research.

What we add

We explain names, terms and essential context. Any conclusion we add must rest on checked facts. We do not invent an impact on Ukraine, financial losses or business advice without supporting sources. Headlines name the event, and numbers in headlines receive context in the article.

AI and pre-publication checks

AI helps collect, compare and present information; it is not a factual source. Our review covers names, dates, figures, headline accuracy and added explanations. Disputed or high-risk material needs separate attention.

Images and video

We use media with reviewed usage rights and identify its origin. An illustrative photograph is not presented as a photograph of the event. A screenshot of a public post keeps the author, date and context, and links to the original. External video loads when the reader approaches the player.

Advertising and corrections

Commercial involvement is identified before the article, with a partner label and name. Payment does not justify an unsupported claim. To report an error, email hello@nodview.com with the URL, passage and supporting source. A substantive correction should say what changed and when.